RELATED STORIES
 
06.12.04 "Clous deal waits on state" by Patrick Sullivan, TCRE
06.08.04 "Residents decry proposed 'after-the-fact' permit" by Keith Matheny, TCRE
06.05.04 "Attorneys say settlement near in Clous case" by Patrick Sullivan, TCRE
06.03.04 "County should demand restoration of site now" Editorial, TCRE
05.24.04 "County moving toward own soil control measures" by Brain McGillivary, TCRE
05.22.04 "Demonstrators engage in 'Tug-o-Wetlands" by Ian Storey, TCRE
05.21.04 "After-the-fact" permit is shoddy public policy" Editorial, TCRE
05.15.04 "'After-fact' permit sought" by Keith Matheny, TCRE

OTHER RESOURCES

Venting Media:  www.ventingmedia.com.  Background, video, and action alerts relating to Clous.
Michigan Department of Environmental Quality: www.michigan.gov/deq
Grand Traverse County:  www.grandtraverse.org
Grand Traverse County Soil Erosion Ordiance

6.10.04 


Letter from Sweetwater Alliance to Army Corps of Engineers urging rejection of 'after-the-fact' permit for wetland fills at the Elk Rapids Preserve.

 

June 10, 2004

Ed Arthur
Corps of Engineers
Sault St. Marie Field Office
St. Mary’s Falls Canal
Sault St. Marie, MI 49783-1880

Dear Mr. Arthur:

I am writing to express our opposition to the issuance of a proposed ‘after-the-fact’ permit for fill activity at the Elk Rapids Preserve (file #99-056-141-0). Rather than granting a belated permit request, we urge the Corps to pursue enforcement actions with the greatest possible speed.

The application fails to meet two key criteria for approval. First, the applicant is required to prove that no “feasible and prudent” alternative exists for siting the development. This clearly has not been demonstrated since an obvious upland alternative exists, as indicated by the applicant’s proposal to create wetlands from uplands that are on the site. Another obvious alternative would be to scale back the project to a number of units appropriate to the ecology of the location.

Second, the proposed mitigation plan is unacceptable. The creation of stormwater detention areas and conservation easements on the few remaining wetlands hardly balances the loss of function that the site has experienced as a result of the applicant’s prior (unpermitted) filling activity.

As you know, wetlands perform a variety of important ecological functions, including filtration of pollutants, providing fish and wildlife habitat, and erosion control, and the public’s interest is hardly served by permitting the loss of these invaluable features of our landscape. In order to achieve full restoration of the damaged areas, we urge you to move forward as quickly as possible with enforcement actions.

Finally, our members feel that issuing ‘after-the-fact’ permits to known environmental offenders is dreadful public policy. The applicant has repeatedly flouted local, state and federal wetlands laws and must be held accountable. Rejecting this permit request and moving ahead aggressively with enforcement are vital to abating future violations.

Sincerely,

Louis E. Blouin
Sweetwater Alliance
441 W. 8th Street, #2
Traverse City, MI 49684
(231) 946-8257
louie@waterissweet.org

 

 
 

Sweetwater Alliance | 206 S. Oak Street, Traverse City, 49684|  Email: contact@waterissweet.org | Phone: 231-228-5489