HOT DATES
 
6.15 MCWC Water and Art Motorcoach Trip from Mt. Pleasant to Newaygo and back. Trip price is $35 per person. More info on our calendar
 



 

 


Latest News

05.07.04 Judge Root orders Nestle to pay MCWC over $100,000 for expert and non-expert legal fees. Read more...
 
03.19.04 After scouting Emmet County for possible spring water sources for its Stanwood plant, Nestle has announced it has no plans to pursue new sites. Read more...

Background

Four the past three years, citizens from across Michigan have battled Nestle (the largest food company and water bottler in the world) over its plans to take hundreds of millions of gallons of spring water from a site in Mecosta County, Michigan. While comparatively small in terms of gallons withdrawn, the Nestle/Ice Mountain project, if allowed to go forward, could have sweeping implications for how water is defined in the public and legal spheres. Also at stake is Michigan's ability to manage future withdrawals, since international trade agreements like NAFTA and WTO/GATT prevent discrimination against corporations for already-sanctioned activities. If Nestle can gain a foothold, a literal "liquid gold rush" is not far behind.

Leading the charge against Nestle have been Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation (MCWC) and Sweetwater Alliance. Though strategically divergent (MCWC has spearheaded a legal fight against Nestle; Sweetwater, direct actions and boycotts), the groups are increasingly united by a common critique: Water, as a resource essential to life, must be considered a right of all living things and protected for the benefit thereof. Any efforts to commodity water—whether by water bottlers or private water firms— must be opposed. Our mantra is "Water for life, not profit!" Our struggle is a shared affirmation of life.

In November 2003, Judge Lawrence Root issued a ruling in MCWC's suit against Nestle, ordering the company to halt all spring water withdrawals by December 16, 2003. Before the ruling could be carried out, however, the Michigan Court of Appeals, pressured by Governor Granholm and the MDEQ, granted an emergency stay of Judge Root's order, allowing Nestle to continue pumping until the appeals process is complete.  Though the stay does not overturn the Root's ruling, the Governor's betrayal was a crushing blow. Citizens have since mobilized to hold the Governor to account. Preventing Nestle from developing future sites is also a top priority for the groups.

More Background
  Sweetwater Backgrounder: The Ice Mountain Proposal at a Glance. A little outdated, but a still a good introduction to the issue.
 

Recent Headlines

06.28.04 "Michigan asked to cut water exports" by Tom Henry, Toledo Blade
06.13.04 "War over bottled water could leave many dry" by Michael Hawthorne, Chicago Tribune
05.19.04 "Bottled water boycott: An idea whose time has come" by Dave Dempsey, Lansing City Pulse
05.07.04 "Judge orders Nestlé to pay legal fees" by MCWC
03.19.04 "Huge water bottler scouting this area" by Beth Anne Piehl, Petoskey News-Review
12.27.03 "State action in Ice Mountain case signals trouble" Detroit Free Press (Editorial)
12.17.03 "Ice Mountain gains a reprieve" by Hugh McDiarmid, Jr. Detroit Free Press
12.16.03 "MCWC: Setback for water rights in Michigan" MCWC Mews Release
12.15.03 "Request to let Ice Mountain resume water flow denied" by Ed White, Muskegon Chronicle
11.25.03 "Judge orders halt to Nestlé's Ice Mountain bottling operation" by Lou Blouin, SWA North

Resources

Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation: www.savemiwater.org
MCWC's Five-Point Plan for Water Stewardship in Michigan 
Judge Lawrence Root's Opinion in MCWC v. Nestle 
MDEQ/Granholm Amicus Brief 
2001 Legal Opinion of Attorney General Jennifer Granholm on Ice Mountain Bottling Case 

 

 
 

Sweetwater Alliance | 206 S. Oak Street, Traverse City, 49684 |  Email: contact@waterissweet.org | Phone: 231-228-5489